Current:Home > MyPasteurization working to kill bird flu in milk, early FDA results find -消息
Pasteurization working to kill bird flu in milk, early FDA results find
View
Date:2025-04-13 17:54:42
Preliminary results of tests run by the Food and Drug Administration show that pasteurization is working to kill off bird flu in milk, the agency said Friday.
"This additional testing did not detect any live, infectious virus. These results reaffirm our assessment that the commercial milk supply is safe," the FDA said in a statement.
The FDA's findings come after the agency disclosed that around 1 in 5 samples of retail milk it had surveyed from around the country had tested positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza, or HPAI H5N1. The U.S. Department of Agriculture this week also ordered testing requirements on cows in response to the outbreak, which has affected growing numbers of poultry and dairy cows.
Positive so-called PCR tests in milk can happen as the result of harmless fragments of the virus left over after pasteurization, officials and experts have said, prompting the additional experiments to verify whether or not the virus found in the milk was infectious. Those tests found it was not.
"The FDA is further assessing retail samples from its study of 297 samples of retail dairy products from 38 states. All samples with a PCR positive result are going through egg inoculation tests, a gold-standard for determining if infectious virus is present," the agency said.
While health authorities have said that milk from visibly sick cows is being discarded before entering the supply chain, officials have acknowledged the possibility that cows could be spreading the virus in their raw milk without symptoms or after they have otherwise appeared to recover.
The FDA said it had also tested several samples of retail powdered infant formula and toddler formula, which the agency said were all negative for the virus.
It is unclear what other foods the FDA has tested. An agency spokesperson did not answer questions about whether dairy products like cream, which can be pasteurized differently, have also been surveyed.
No beef cattle have been detected with the virus, the USDA has said, although it remains unclear whether the department has surveyed retail beef products for the virus.
So far, only one human infection has been reported this year, in a person who had contact with dairy cattle in Texas.
Though growing evidence is now confirming the safety of pasteurized milk, an additional challenge also remains for health authorities as they grapple with the possibility that dairy industry workers could be unknowingly exposed to the virus.
Unlike poultry, which quickly die off or are culled after H5N1 infections, cows largely go on to recover after a month or two.
Other animals have also not fared as well during the outbreak: the USDA said Friday that deaths and neurological disease had been "widely reported" in cats around dairy farms. Officials have said they suspect cats had been drinking leftover raw milk from infected cows.
"We know that the illness in cattle can go on for several weeks. So that puts workers at an ongoing risk. And thus, the period for monitoring will be longer," the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Sonja Olsen told reporters this week.
- In:
- Bird Flu
- Food and Drug Administration
- Avian Influenza
Alexander Tin is a digital reporter for CBS News based in the Washington, D.C. bureau. He covers the Biden administration's public health agencies, including the federal response to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19.
TwitterveryGood! (4)
Related
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Burt Young, Oscar-nominated actor who played Paulie in ‘Rocky’ films, dies at 83
- Musician Mike Skinner turns actor and director with ‘The Darker the Shadow, the Brighter the Light’
- Nokia plans to cut up to 14,000 jobs after sales and profits plunge in a weak market
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Which Republicans voted against Jim Jordan's speaker bid Wednesday — and who changed sides?
- Jim Jordan lost a second House speaker vote. Here's what happens next.
- Mike Pompeo thinks Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin would be a really good president
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- 2 children die in an early morning fire at a Middle Tennessee home
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- U.S. to create new immigration program for Ecuadorians aimed at discouraging border crossings
- Humanitarian crisis in Gaza an 'unprecedented catastrophe,' UN says
- How many votes are needed to win the House speaker election?
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- There's one business like show business
- Italian lawmakers approve 10 million euros for long-delayed Holocaust Museum in Rome
- 'The House of Doors' offers an ingenious twist, exploring how literature works magic
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
U.S. to create new immigration program for Ecuadorians aimed at discouraging border crossings
Texas city settles lawsuit over police response to Trump supporters surrounding Biden bus in 2020
Kosovo asks for more NATO-led peacekeepers along the border with Serbia
New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
Trailblazing Brooklyn judge Rachel Freier recounts difficult return from Israel
Which Republicans voted against Jim Jordan's speaker bid Wednesday — and who changed sides?
Far-right influencer sentenced to 7 months in 2016 voter suppression scheme